Categories
Articles Current Affairs Pakistani Newspapers

China’s growing influence in South Asia (By: Rida Khan)

Let China sleep, for when she wakes, she will shake the world,” Napoleon’s words seem spookily veracious today, as the shock waves from China’s awakening echo around the globe.

Ever since the Asian Dragon has risen it has been expanding its wings in dabbling Asian countries by helping them built their finances in projects granted by their government.

Just over half a century ago, China was reeling from one of the most significant economic catastrophes in state history. Today, China has exploded with GDP growth at 6.8% per year making the state the second largest economy of the world. It had lifted more than 600 million people out of poverty and has emerged as the largest trading partner of US, EU, India and Japan. Measured strictly by GDP, China will likely surpass the US within the next few years (Giles).

The most remarkable economic transformation in human history has led to a significant ‘rise of China’ phenomenon, which caused a profound “shift in global dynamics and evolving geopolitics” in a more “south-orientated world” (UN).

China has also broadened its diplomatic activities ever since, playing a key role in international institutions and wielding greater geopolitical influence in Asia and around the world. In the process it has become the second most influential country in the world after the US. For instance, its role in stimulating the world economy and even resolving nuclear issues in the Korean Peninsula and the Persian Gulf has been crucial.

In this new order, China is becoming a more responsible player on the global stage and addressing international issues such as global terrorism, environmental degradation, energy security, international crime and so on.

In political realism, power is the capability to make another state do something it would not otherwise do and vice versa. What makes a state powerful is about its capability of influencing another. In the world of states, this capability is based on both tangible and intangible characteristics of the state. Tangible characteristics include things as state’s size, economy, military, technological development and population. Talking specifically of Asia, China is indeed the ASIAN DRAGON.   Ambitiousness, hardworking, national will, the intangible characteristics, also drove China to success.

As power is inflationary, so when countries become stronger, their interest expands beyond their borders, where they must find new ways to protect those interests. China is no exception. Thus, in order to sustain its peaceful rise, it is increasing its influence around the world and South Asia is no different.

The South Asian region, home to one fourth of the world’s population, is one of the least economically integrated regions in the world. Intraregional trade remains well below its potential due to, “historical political tensions and mistrust, with cross-border conflicts and security concerns” (World Bank). Most South Asian countries rely heavily on developed nations as export destinations, and increasingly import from China.

Since 21st century, China has been conducting multi-dimensional cooperation with all of the South Asian countries (Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka). Chinas linkage with South Asian countries expanded to all fields including economic, communication, cultural exchange, energy and the untraditional security cooperation.

China’s major interests in South Asia include promoting stability in both Afghanistan and Pakistan in order to curb the influence of Islamist extremists, and to facilitate trade and energy corridors throughout the region that China can access, that is to increase its presence in the Indian Ocean Region. The Ocean accounts for half the world’s seaborne container traffic, and 70 percent of the total traffic of the world’s petroleum. China considers the Ocean to be a key strategic waterway because a significant portion of its goods and oil transit through the Ocean. China’s South Asian Strategy also focuses on enhancing its influence with other South Asian states as part of a global effort to extend its diplomatic and economic influence.

As China is energy thirsty economic power, it is highly sensitive to the fact that these resources, which are essential to China’s economic productivity could be interdicted by hostile state or non-state actors. So, China seeks greater presence and influence in the Indian Ocean region, primarily to protect the sea lines of communication upon which its economy depends, as well as to expand its influence.

It is in this context that cases such as CPEC can be viewed. The China-Pakistan nexus is by far the most important and dynamic relationship in South Asia , accentuating China’s desire to maintain a foothold in the Indian Ocean.  In 2015, China and Pakistan launched the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)—which falls under the OBOR umbrella—with the signing of 49 agreements to finance a variety of projects with a total expected value of $46 billion, including upgrades to Pakistan’s Gwadar Port, oil and gas pipelines, road and railway infrastructure, and a series of energy projects. CPEC aims to link western China by road and rail down to the Gwadar deep water port, located at the edge of the Strait of Hormuz in the Arabian Sea, via 2,000 miles of rail, road, and pipelines.

China’s one of the major interests in South Asia is to promote peace and stability in Afghanistan, which stems in part from its desire to access the country as a gateway to Central Asia and Europe. It is also primarily driven by its desire to prevent conflict from spilling over into western China in the Xinjiang autonomous region as given the presumed link between the Taliban leadership in Afghanistan and the East Turkestan Independence Movement, a Uighur separatist movement in China’s Xinjian province that borders Afghanistan. China hopes that, eventually, long-term stability in Afghanistan will allow it to build railways, roads, electricity, and water projects in the country as part of its Silk Road Economic Belt.

Projects like CPEC, Belt and Road Initiative are the part of the “Chinese dream” that will fulfill China’s plan to become next superpower. Through project like these China is in a way securing a new alternative trade for goods especially oil and gas from Middle East.

China’s one belt and road initiative is the most ambitious infrastructure project in modern history that’s designed to reroute the global trade. This potentially ambitious project covering about  60%  of the world’s population, about one-third of the world’s GDP, and about a quarter of all the goods and services the world moves, creating a network of railways, roads, pipelines, and utility grids that would link China and Central Asia, West Asia, and parts of South Asia . “One Belt, One Road” strategy, is expected to relieve China of the “Malacca dilemma”, what then President Hu Jintao in 2003 called China’s overreliance on the Malacca Strait for trade.

While the concerns in Afghanistan persist, China has already become a major investor in Afghanistan, through projects like the Mes Aynak copper mine—a $3.5 billion project in Logar province, the largest direct foreign investment in Afghanistan’s history—particularly due to its considerable supply of rare earth minerals and its potential as a pathway for Chinese trade into Central Asia.

In the past decade, China has emerged as a top exporter of goods to the region breaking into South Asian markets with its export-led growth strategy. Bangladesh provides the starkest example of this trend. China has become Bangladesh’s top trading partner in 2015, imports from China (including Hong Kong) were 27 percent of Bangladesh’s total imports. China offers cheaper Chinese products (especially cotton and other fabrics central to Bangladesh’s garment industry) without the visa, transport, and customs challenges. Besides, Bangladesh and China hold regular military exchanges, Beijing has provided Dhaka with five maritime patrol vessels, two small warships, 44 tanks, and 16 fighter jets, as well as surface-to-air and anti-ship missiles. Bangladesh has even allocated two special economic zones for Chinese investors in Chittagong, a major port, and Dhaka, the capital. In return China played a large role in developing and modernizing Bangladesh’s port at Chittagong.

The Chinese dragon has advanced swiftly in Sri Lanka, which is located on a key trade route in the Indian Ocean. China’s exports to Sri Lanka are rising fast. Other than Pakistan, Sri Lanka has been the leading beneficiary of Chinese infrastructure investment in South Asia , with nearly $15 billion worth of projects between 2009 and 2014. More than the bilateral trade, it is the growing Chinese investment in infrastructure that has enhanced China’s influence in Sri Lanka. Some of the Chinese investments in Sri Lanka are the construction of Puttalam Coal Power Plant, Supreme Court Complex, Gingang Flood Protection Scheme, a US$1 .4 billion plan to build an artificial island off Colombo, designed with malls, hotels and marinas, a project that seeks to rival Singapore and Dubai. On other hand to facilitate Chinese investment, the Sri Lankan Board of Investment has taken various steps like demarcating a separate zone for Chinese investors at Mirigama (China is the first country to have an Exclusive Economic Zone – EEZ – in Sri Lanka), establishing an investment promotion office in Shanghai, and earmarking a special five year visa for investors. Sri Lanka had even allowed Chinese submarines to dock at Colombo port twice in late 2014.

Nepal showcases another facet of China’s growing influence in South Asia . Unlike Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, which give China access to strategically located ports, Nepal is a small, landlocked country. Its location squeezed between Tibet and India makes it an important buffer zone for China. China’s main interest in Nepal also stems from its concern over the large Tibetan refugee community there.  Beijing has pressed Kathmandu to tighten its borders with Tibet, which has led to a major decrease in the number of Tibetans able to flee to Nepal in recent years. China is also bolstering trade with Nepal, pursuing road building and hydropower projects and had provided its swift assistance following the devastating earthquake in April 2015. Nepal had also signed several agreements with China, including a permanent arrangement for energy supplies and a transit treaty granting Nepal access to Chinese ports.

China has its influence even in India. India–China economic relations have expanded in recent years. China has captured Indian market not only in the subcontinent but also in India. It is India’s biggest trading partner, with bilateral trade totaling around $71 billion in 2014. Despite the border tensions and maritime competition, India is interested in expanding economic and commercial ties between countries. The two countries had signed 24 agreements and nearly $30 billion worth of business deals. Though India’s trade relationship with China has leapfrogged in the last decade, the corresponding political relationship has been higgledy-piggledy. A section within India (belonging to the strategic community) believes in the outdated “string of pearls” strategy by China and views Beijing as a threat, advocating a confrontational strategy.

India fears that Chinese investment in South Asian ports not only serves Chinese commercial interests, but also facilitates Chinese military goals. India perceives the Chinese presence in South Asian countries as a design to circumvent what was once considered as India’s sphere of influence.

The reason why china is so far successful in influencing south Asia is because of many factors. The one of major reasons are that it has managed to project itself as a disinterested neighbour. China has never interfered with other countries’ internal affairs. Besides unlike the rest of the international community where countries have to meet strict ethical order, China offers billions of dollars mostly in loans with far fewer conditions. BRI has been hit with less democratic countries in the region.

However the challenge for China is to ensure that its ameliorating position benefits all nations. It is high time that the nations of South Asia move beyond mistrust and old paradigms and engage with each other in meaningful and mutually-beneficial ways. This remains the region’s greatest challenge.

Published in: Daily Nation Lahore


The above article can be read for

CSS Current Affairs, CSS International Relations, China Pakistan Relations, China and South Asia


 

Categories
Essays Outlines

Essay Outline: The Role of Opposition in the Politics of Pakistan

  1. Introduction
  2. What is opposition, its forms and extent?
  • Fundamental components of liberal democracy
  • Parliamentary opposition
  • Unconstitutional opposition
  • Opposition as minority party
  1. A conceptual framework of opposition in Pakistan
  2. Historical events which have proved that opposition have played constructive role to mobilise public opinion in Pakistan.
  • Peasant movement in East Pakistan
  • Language movement in East Pakistan
  • Anti-Ahmadiyya movement in the Punjab
  • Anti-One Unit movement in West Pakistan
  1. What is the role of opposition in an emerging democracy of Pakistan?
  • The role in democratic governance
  • The voice of the voiceless
  • An alternative to the ruling government
  • An official opposition
  1. What the opposition can do for the people of Pakistan
  • To build confidence of the peopleIqra Shaukat CSS
  • To reassure their concerns and interests
  • To improve the quality of life
  • To criticize by offering cogent reasons
  • To protect society from the excesses and corruption of power
  • To change every abuse of executive power, bureaucracy redtapism
  • To address the issues of human rights
  • To protect the public funds
  • To be vigilant as watch dog
  • To stimulate democratic debate
  1. Is it true opposition has failed completely to play its role in Pakistan?
  2. Which factors are responsible for ineffective role of opposition in Pakistan?
  • Military – Bureaucratic oligarchy
  • Socio-Cultural incongruities
  • Difference of opinions between right and left
  • Ethic divisions of political parties
  • Linguistic problems
  1. What are the legitimate rights of the opposition in Pakistan?
  • To operate in a free and democratic atmosphere
  • To access state’s Media
  • To get freedom of association, speech and demonstrations
  • To freely access materials from official sources
  • To have free access to the people
  • To discharge its duty effectively
  • To be accorded the same treatment and facilities
  1. What are responsibilities of opposition in Pakistan?
  • To fair in the criticism of government policies
  • To uphold, defend the sovereignty
  • To work for national integration
  • To join hands government to tackle the natural disasters
  1. What are measures which can help to bolster the role of opposition in Pakistan?
  • By active political participation
  • By acting as organized and institutionalized agent
  • By taking stance on the contemporary issues
  • By harnessing public opinion
  • By leading to conciliation or unification
  • By playing oversight role to ensure government actions in the interest of general masses
  • By exposing weakness in government policies
  • By playing Effective role to further vistas of glory and achievement
  1. Conclusion
Categories
Articles Current Affairs Pakistani Newspapers

12 Afghan dams a new threat to Pakistan (By: Muhammad Nadeem Bhatti)

[mks_button size=”large” title=”By: Muhammad Nadeem Bhatti” style=”squared” url=”#” target=”_self” bg_color=”#1e73be” txt_color=”#FFFFFF” icon=”” icon_type=”” nofollow=”0″]

World moves on energy and the main source of it is water. In previous days what India had done to us is passed over, do we realise what Afghanistan is going to do with us now? Have we decided that after destroying our fields and villages, we all have to die with thirst. The first time we came to know in summer of 2010 that Afghanistan is not making one or two but the entire twelve dams at Kabul river and it has India’s full support. Not only the support, India actually convinced that the river would become a part of the aggression against Pakistan by creating dozens of dams on the river. India is not limited to technical support only, it is ready to invest. India has also developed Afghanistan’s feasibility report. Remember that before the announcement of the project, Afghanistan already had made few dams on Kabul based on American support. Now in this regard the World Bank is also ready to provide $8 billion for these dams to Afghanistan.

It is important to imagine the importance of the Kabul River for Pakistan. The river water is available nine months from February to October. 80 percent of the total agricultural cultivation of KP is irrigated from the same river. It is watering 60 percent of the land of Noshera, And, 85% fertile land of Charsadda is dependent on this river. Pakistan has made the Warsaw Dam over the river. Now, if Afghanistan builds twelve dams on this river and stores large quantities of water, then what kind of mess Pakistan will be facing.

It’s been years we know about Afgan dams. But in these years, this matter has never been discussed in our parliament. Unfortunately our leaders have rarely talked about how dramatic water crisis is going to get? Has any ministry prepared any report on it and has Parliament ever organised special session on that?

Allah has given a natural dam to Pakistan. This is the Kala Bagh Dam. Unfortunately when there is talk on this dam, some leaders begin jumping on the ground and say that this dam can only be built on their dead bodies. After India, Afghanistan too is making dams. But Pakistan is not doing much despite a crisis.

Pakistan is going to be suffering from a terrible crisis of water. What Afghanistan is going to do with us is very dangerous. We have a contract with India, but there is no agreement with Afghanistan regarding water. We burnt ourselves in Taliban fight but we could not have any agreement on water from Afghanistan. We delayed the Nailam Jhelum project and the case of India’s Kishan Ganga was strengthened; we could not even make the Munda Dam and now the number of proposed sub-dams of Afghanistan are powerful. Is it only our laziness or ineffectiveness?

It is not that we are completely dependent on India and Afghanistan for water and besides this we have no means. Pakistan is the reward of Allah. We also have snow curtains that make the water source of water. We also have monsoon showers and it is rainy in the winter too. Pakistan is wasting 90 percent of its water in the sea because it does not have the dam to store this water .This wasted water is worth $21 billion annually. First of all, we will have to make Kala Bagh Dam.

Water crisis is not limited to agricultural use only. The crisis of drinking water is also there. Only 12 percent of the water supply system is clean and 88% of people connected to it are drinking dirty and hazardous water. According to the report of the administration of planning and development, arsenic, fluoride and nitrate is being found in drinking water and according to the report of the Pakistan Council of Water Resources, 200,000 children are dying every year due to hazardous health water. According to an independent report, 300,000 children are dying every year due to hazardous water.

There is no doubt Pakistan is an agriculture country and depends upon 75% agriculture cultivation and the major crops are fully valuable even exportable by modern changes, especially cotton, cane and rice which need water on time to enhance the value of cultivation. Our leaders need to take immediate decisions of build dams for the survival of the country and if is not done one can say that we have made the final decision of collective suicide?

Courtesy: Daily The Nation

Categories
Articles Current Affairs International Relations Pakistani Newspapers

The autonomy of US failure in Afghanistan

The autonomy of US failure in Afghanistan

[mks_button size=”medium” title=”By: Durdana Najam” style=”squared” url=”#” target=”_self” bg_color=”#1e73be” txt_color=”#FFFFFF” icon=”” icon_type=”” nofollow=”1″]

Will Afghanistan savour peace? The three-day truce between the insurgents and the Afghan security agencies, on the occasion of Eid, has been celebrated as proof that the estrangement between the Afghans has the potential to meltdown.  However easy the meltdown of estrangement may seem, the reality is that for the Taliban, and all those fighting for an Afghanistan free from the clutches of the foreign force, the road to peace passes through tough terrain.  A passage the US and its partner, both within and outside Afghanistan, are loath to travel.  In retrospect, Afghanistan has been made a difficult country not only because the war against terrorism was a wrong attempt to ouster the Taliban, but also because the US policies after the invasion went terribly wrong. The US has pursued its vested interest rather than the interest of Afghanistan or the region. Below is the brief anatomy of what went wrong in Afghanistan and how.

1.    The distraction of US interest

The US invaded Afghanistan on the assumption that it posed an existential threat to International security. The offshoot of this assumption was that if the west did not intervene the mad mullah would get hold of the nukes in Pakistan and destroy the world.  None of the assumptions were true, and we saw that, as soon as, the Al-Qaeda was pushed out and the Taliban government was toppled Afghanistan became just one of those 20 countries that should have concerned the west.  It so happened because the US neither had the power nor the knowledge or legitimacy to transform Afghanistan. The least the US could have done to justify its presence in the region was to maintain a light military presence and generous developmental projects.  The matter was made worse when the Iraq war was started, and Afghanistan was left with the CIA that drowned the country in money to produce more thugs.

Categories
Pakistan Affairs World General Knowledge

Geography of Pakistan: The borders of Pakistan

Geography of Pakistan

Pakistan is located in South Asia and is at the junction of Central Asia and Middle East, which gives its location great significance. Pakistan’s total land border is 6,774 kilometres long and it borders four countries. Pakistan borders India in the east, Afghanistan and Iran in the west and China is situated at the northeast. While surrounded by land from three sides, the Arabian Sea lies in the south. Here we will focus on Pakistan’s international borders and some interesting facts about them.

Categories
Articles Current Affairs International Relations Pakistani Newspapers

Singapore Summit – Challenges and Prospects (By: Beenish Altaf)

Despite mutual optimism, analysts on both sides are of the view that it is too early to call it a win-win summit


[mks_button size=”medium” title=”By: Beenish Altaf” style=”squared” url=”#” target=”_self” bg_color=”#0066bf” txt_color=”#FFFFFF” icon=”icon-user-female” icon_type=”sl” nofollow=”0″]

A country that was once strongly frowned upon, that was reason for the heightened global concern for nuclear buildup, is now being appreciated for its diplomatic panache to the extent that the US decided to change its decisions favouring that state. President Donald Trump, just a day ago, reversed its decision of military exercises with South Korea by calling it a “waste of money”.

This is in the backdrop of a Summit held on June 12, 2018 between the US and North Korea in Singapore. Since the Prime Minister of Singapore Lee Hsien Loong welcomed the meeting open-heartedly, the role of the country, is fairly vital in carrying out parlays among both the leaders, that is, Kim Jong-un and Donald Trump. It is believed to be the first remarkable deal in many years among both the countries. Regarding its agenda, largely denuclearisation has been on the top most priority list in the summit; however, its outcomes could not be assessed before time. Some are anticipating the hopeful outcome seeing it as a good step for building favorable relationship between the US and North Korea, while others are apprehensive of it. Paradoxically, the country habitual of military solutions i.e. the US, is evidently foreseeing a “good feeling” for North Korea this time; with reference to the June’s summit.

Categories
Articles Pakistan Affairs

Nuclear Programme of Pakistan | History and Overview

Historical Perspective:

Pakistan successfully detonated its six nuclear devices at Chaagi on 28 may 1998. If we go into past, Although Pakistan recognized as an independent state on 14th August 1947. Our first door neighbor India never endure Pakistan as a state.  They always use to torture and destabalise Pakistan when they got an opportunity. Wars in 1948, 1965 and 1971 shows Indian wrath and rage for Pakistan.

As Pakistan was relatively fragile state than India, they have a continuous fear of physical confrontation from her neighbor. In reaction to the India’s demonstration as a nuclear state on 18th may 1974, Pakistan also decided to establish some Nuclear institutes in order to overcome the threats of the world particularly India. The two most important reasons behind Pakistan setting up of nuclear institutes are

  • India’s rash and imprudent decision to make a series of explosions.
  • Jubilation in India after adopting aggressive and hostile stance against Pakistan.

The impartial survey proves that Pakistan did their best to convince India to keep south Asia free from Nuclear weapons but Indian bosses’ didn’t’ accept any offer from Pakistan. Even they were not ready to negotiate with Pakistan.

Categories
Articles CSS Compulsory Subjects Current Affairs Islamic Studies

The Muslim World on the Verge of Destruction

The Muslim World on the Verge of Destruction

The Muslims had ruled over the world 1000 of years ago. They were at climax because of their firm belief at unity. They had firm belief on the Holy Quran but it is law of nature that everything that rises sees a downfall. As long as the Muslim stuck to their religion, they succeeded but when they abandoned their moral values, they suffered downfall.

Muslim Ummah currently passing from catastrophic period and the era of their destruction began when they commenced trusting their enemies, they suffered insurmountable loss.  If we look into the above issue with cool mind, it will dawn upon us that the disunity among the Muslim Ummah is the major cause of their decline. If we have a bird eye view of the current scenario, it will be revealed that the Muslims are fighting against their own Muslim brothers due to lack of unity.

Categories
Current Affairs Pakistani Newspapers

Counting the cost of Trump’s air war in Afghanistan

[mks_button size=”medium” title=”By: Kevin Ponniah” style=”squared” url=”” target=”_self” bg_color=”#007974″ txt_color=”#FFFFFF” icon=”fa-user” icon_type=”fa” nofollow=”1″]

The helicopters arrived shortly after midday and sent a rocket hurtling into an area at the back of the crowd where children were sitting.

As people began to flee, witnesses said, heavy machine gun fire followed them.

It was the latest deadly example of how a ferocious new air campaign against the Taliban has caused a spike in civilian casualties from US and Afghan air operations.

This Afghan Air Force attack on 2 April in north-eastern Kunduz province killed at least 36 people and injured 71, the UN says. Although witnesses said Taliban fighters and senior figures were in the crowd, 30 of those killed were children. Hundreds of people had gathered outside a madrassa in the Taliban-controlled district of Dasht-e-Archi to watch a group of students have turbans tied around their heads in a traditional ceremony to recognise their memorisation of the Holy Quran.

“I saw turbans, shoes, arms, legs and blood everywhere,” one local resident told the BBC the next day, describing the aftermath. Everyone in the area knew the event was happening, and many children, he said, had turned up for the free lunch that was about to be served.

Since President Trump announced his Afghanistan strategy and committed more troops to the conflict last August, the number of bombs dropped by the US Air Force has surged dramatically. New rules of engagement have made it easier for US forces to carry out strikes against the Taliban, and resources have shifted to Afghanistan as the fight against the Islamic State group in Syria and Iraq winds down.

Heavy bombing against the Taliban and IS saw more Afghan civilians killed and injured from the air in 2017 than at any time since the UN began counting in 2009. In the first quarter of this year – before the Dasht-e-Archi incident – 67 people were killed and 75 injured by the strikes, more than half of them women and children. There was no let-up in the bombardment even during the bitter Afghan winter, a time when fighting usually draws down before picking up again in the spring. At the same time, the US has launched a five-year plan to massively expand and overhaul the Afghan Air Force, including providing it with 159 Black Hawk helicopters. John W Nicholson, the top US general in Afghanistan, has pledged that a “tidal wave of air power” will be unleashed.

The aim of this air barrage, analysts say, is to try to push the Taliban to the negotiating table, and perhaps bring an end to America’s longest war – which has dragged on for 17 years. But when helicopters mow down children at a religious ceremony, as in Dasht-e-Archi, it raises significant questions for both Washington and Kabul, and supplies potent propaganda for the Taliban.

Although the Afghan government said the strikes targeted senior Taliban leaders planning an attack on Kunduz city, “those helicopter pilots must have seen the children”, says Kate Clark of the Kabul-based Afghanistan Analysts Network. “You can’t attack an open-air gathering in a helicopter and not see who you are going to kill.”

A grim conclusion, she added, is the possibility that the Afghan Air Force did not see those particular civilians as “their people”.

US Air Strikes in AFghanistanIn a 5 June report, the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission said the attack was a “war crime”.

After initially denying that civilians had been killed, the Afghan government eventually apologised well over a month later and offered compensation to victims’ families. It has announced an investigation. “The key difference between the government and insurgents is that a legitimate government will always seek forgiveness for mistakes,” President Ashraf Ghani said.

Activists say the US also bears responsibility for such attacks carried out by Afghan air forces. “They train the pilots, the controllers, and they provide all the equipment,” said Patricia Gossman, the senior Afghanistan researcher at Human Rights Watch.

The Nato mission in Afghanistan, Resolute Support, said US and international forces had “no involvement” in the 2 April attack. While advisers “assist in the development of doctrine that guides the Afghan Air Force decision-making process”, a spokesperson said, they are not involved in decision-making for Afghan mission planning or targeting,

The spokesperson added: “Both the Afghan Air Force and US Forces-Afghanistan adhere to the International Laws of Armed Conflict. We constantly reiterate the importance of minimising civilian casualties, from operational planning, to targeting, to execution.

“Distinguishing military targets from civilian persons, limiting collateral damage, and using only proportional force are all assessed and applied prior to each strike.”

But Afghan forces are not the only ones that make mistakes: US bombs killed at least 154 civilians in 2017, according to the UN mission in Afghanistan, while the Afghan Air Force killed 99.

Observers say that about a decade ago international forces made a concerted effort to bring down civilian casualties from air strikes. Then Afghan President Hamid Karzai was a strident critic of US bombings, decrying them as violations of Afghanistan’s sovereignty.

“They had a dedicated Civilian Casualty mitigation team that analysed each incident, they had people who made site visits,” said Ms Gossman. “Since 2014, the Civilian Casualties Team at Resolute Support is much smaller, they don’t do site visits. They don’t talk to victims, witnesses or other local sources like medical personnel.”

Resolute Support says it and the US military only investigate allegations of civilian casualties from their own actions. Those investigations may include site visits if it safe to do so and “if reasonably available information is insufficient to confirm or disprove the allegation”.

Most civilian casualties in Afghanistan are still caused by anti-government groups like the Taliban and IS and, despite the heavy bombing, it does not appear that the US has become more careless in its approach to protecting civilians. The total number of weapons dropped by the US Air Force increased by 226% from 2016 to 2017, while over the same period, civilian casualties from Afghan and US air strikes rose by 7%.

Total civilian casualties from all sources actually decreased slightly, driven in particular by a lower toll from ground offensives. So although more civilians died in air attacks, it looks like the increased air cover may have prevented the Taliban from mounting major assaults on population centres, says Kate Clark.

In any case, the Dasht-e-Archi incident should be “a wake-up call for the government, people in charge of the air force and the US trainers”, she said.

Others believe that the entire strategy of pounding the Taliban militarily is misguided. A recent BBC study found that Taliban fighters are openly active in 70% of Afghanistan.

Barnett Rubin, who served as senior adviser to the Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan at the US Department of State from 2009-2013, said the air campaign was having “no strategic effect”.

“They are just fighting the same war over for the 17th time,” said Mr Rubin, who argues that a consensus between Afghanistan’s neighbours and the major powers is a pre-requisite to creating a stable Afghanistan.

The current situation “is an irreversible stalemate”, he said, adding that if it changes “in the medium to long-term, it will only change against us.”–BBC

Originally Published in Daily The Nation 

Categories
Articles Current Affairs Pakistani Newspapers

Water crisis: Why is Pakistan running dry?

Pakistan could “run dry” by 2025 as its water shortage is reaching an alarming level. The authorities remain negligent about the crisis that’s posing a serious threat to the country’s stability, DW reports.

According to a recent report by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Pakistan ranks third in the world among countries facing acute water shortage. Reports by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources (PCRWR) also warn the authorities that the South Asian country will reach absolute water scarcity by 2025. “No person in Pakistan, whether from the north with its more than 5,000 glaciers, or from the south with its ‘hyper deserts,’ will be immune to this scarcity,” said Neil Buhne, UN humanitarian coordinator for Pakistan.

Researchers predict that Pakistan is on its way to becoming the most water-stressed country in the region by the year 2040. It is not the first time that development and research organisations have alerted Pakistani authorities about an impending crisis, which some analysts say poses a bigger threat to the country than terrorism says DW in its report on water issue in Pakistan.

In 2016, PCRWR reported that Pakistan touched the “water stress line” in 1990 and crossed the “water scarcity line” in 2005. If this situation persists, Pakistan is likely to face an acute water shortage or a drought-like situation in the near future, according to PCRWR, which is affiliated with the South Asian country’s Ministry of Science and Technology.